Mail Archives: djgpp/1994/11/11/23:05:52
>I don't know if this has come up before or if it already exist, i.e. I
>didn't dig real deep in doing my homework, but.. ;) I was thinking,
>providing there was enough interest, developing a macro convertor from
>(T/M)ASM -> as and vise-versa using maybe flex? The biggest turn off for
>djgpp that I've found for most, is the fact they lerned using tasm...
>IMHO a true waist considering it's native only to x86, but try telling
>others that. This would slow down a programs development cycle, but
>would at least attract tasm users to our cause.. ;) could also be used
>for Linux, or even other systems. TASM code on a SPARC? <shudder>
Good idea (except for the SPARC one :-). Until recently, I had thought most
assemblers were like MASM, etc. -- i.e. using machine-specific opcodes and
syntax (making the faulty assumption that assembly code was just a
non-portable way to get more internal hardware access and/or speed up
functions).
--- Aaron Ucko (ucko AT vax1 DOT rockhurst DOT edu; finger for PGP public key) -=- httyp!
-=*=-Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.-=*=-
Geek code 2.1 [finger hayden AT vax1 DOT mankato DOT msus DOT edu for explanation]:
GCS/M/S d(-) H s g+ p? !au a-- w+ v+ C++(+++)>++++ U-(S+)>++++ P+ L>++ 3(-)
E-(----) !N>++ K- W(--) M-(--) V(--) po-(--) Y+(++) t(+) !5 j R G tv--(-)
b+++ !D(--) B--(---) e>++++(*) u++(@) h!() f(+) r-(--)>+++ n+(-) y?
- Raw text -