Date:	Tue, 15 Nov 1994 16:40:38 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Aaron Ucko <UCKO AT VAX1 DOT ROCKHURST DOT EDU>
Subject:	Re: Ununderstandable Subject
To:	TAUPIN AT rsovax DOT lps DOT u-psud DOT fr
Cc:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Organization:	Rockhurst College; Kansas City, MO

>To all people who complaint: below is the text of a message I sent
>from my faulty VAX (with Subj: instead of Subject:) to another
>account on a recent UNIX HP_UX HP9000.
>
>The Subj: clearly appears in the TOC of the mail, and in the
>text of the mail I show below. Thus, this is some kind of
>intolerance by SOME (not all) mail receivers which refuse to
>understand the up-to-date Subject: as well as the old fashioned
>Subj:.

We receive the "Subj:" line just fine, but then again we'd also receive "Foo:
Bar" if you inserted it in your header.  The question is, if you tell the
other system you want to reply to the message you sent it, will it take the
"Subj:" line?  Probably not.

>to say" you are silly not to be able to read german (same for
>French, Latine and ancient Greek).
		    ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ And how does one write that in ASCII?

--- Aaron Ucko (ucko AT vax1 DOT rockhurst DOT edu; finger for PGP public key) -=- httyp!
-=*=-Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.-=*=-
Geek code 2.1 [finger hayden AT vax1 DOT mankato DOT msus DOT edu for explanation]: 
 GCS/M/S d(-) H s g+ p? !au a-- w+ v+ C++(+++)>++++ U-(S+)>++++ P+ L>++ 3(-) 
 E-(----) !N>++ K- W(--) M-(--) V(--) po-(--) Y+(++) t(+) !5 j R G tv--(-) 
 b+++ !D(--) B--(---) e>++++(*) u++(@) h!() f(+) r-(--)>+++ n+(-) y?

- Raw text -