Date:	Fri, 18 Nov 1994 08:01:49 -0500 (EST)
From:	Long Doan <ldoan1 AT osf1 DOT gmu DOT edu>
To:	Aaron Ucko <UCKO AT VAX1 DOT ROCKHURST DOT EDU>
Cc:	langston AT iaccess DOT za, djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Subject:	Re: Having problems including ASM

On Thu, 17 Nov 1994, Aaron Ucko wrote:

> >however I want to use TASM because I know it very well and I like it's power
> >and portability. Can I do this/How do I do this?
>      ^^^^^^^^^^^ (?)
> In what way is TASM portable?  The AT&T mnemonics used by GAS for 386's are,
> or so I've heard, more portable than the Intel ones.  At any rate, they're
> almost, but not quite, entirely unlike TASM's, so you have to learn a whole
> new syntax.  Bletch! :-)

  Not really, the mnemonics are almost the same, with 
source<->destination swapped. Also, () is used instead of [], and 
registers have a % in front... :-(

+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Long Doan                          ldoan1 AT osf1 DOT gmu DOT edu |
|                                          ld AT netrix DOT com |
+--------------------------------------------------------+

- Raw text -