ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2002/04/10/13:46:40

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:46:37 -0400
Message-Id: <200204101746.g3AHkb003845@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <MPG.171e9828cbff1a8e989687@news.icm.edu.pl> (message from Tomasz
Dobek on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:43:26 +0200)
Subject: Re: Huge differences in compilation time between gcc/gpp
References: <MPG DOT 171e94b2eddf849f989686 AT news DOT icm DOT edu DOT pl> <a91t3m$hb$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <MPG DOT 171e9828cbff1a8e989687 AT news DOT icm DOT edu DOT pl>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Is P166 too old for C++, then ? (with MSVC++ I can compile C++ in few 
> seconds)  

I used to use a 386/20 for gcc development.  I still have a 486/20
with DJGPP on it.  A P166 is blazingly fast compared to those.  You
just have to be more careful about setting up the cache and ramdisk.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019