From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Subject:	Re: DJGPP r.i.p :( ?
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<Xns9266CA112EA2raf256com AT 213 DOT 180 DOT 128 DOT 20> <1029002476 DOT 319494 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <Xns9266CD7E2B3B8raf256com AT 213 DOT 180 DOT 128 DOT 20>
User-Agent:	tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.5_BETA (alpha))
Message-ID:	<1029062722.562005@queeg.ludd.luth.se>
Cache-Post-Path:	queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se
X-Cache:	nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Date:	11 Aug 2002 10:45:22 GMT
Lines:	16
NNTP-Posting-Date:	11 Aug 2002 10:45:22 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	queeg.ludd.luth.se
X-Trace:	1029062722 news.luth.se 443 130.240.16.109
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Rafal 'Raf256' Maj <rafal AT raf256 DOT com> wrote:
:> It must be done by somebody. Why don't _you_?

: it's to hard for me, If I could done that then I would be a Allegro author, 
: not user

Well. Then it's time you become one...

Look. You've been waiting to Allegro to be fixed, right? Nothing yet,
right? So it looks like you are the one to change this. Nice to be
singled out and know your purpose, isn't it?


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -