Mail Archives: djgpp/2009/05/07/04:10:31
On 05/07/2009 09:49 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On May 6, 6:22 pm, Glaux<gl DOT DOT DOT AT centrum DOT cz> wrote:
>
>> I tried most of editors mentioned here. I like Borland styled IDE so I
>> still use RHIDE for DJGPP coding (and DOS Navigator for other files).
>> Unfortunatelly RHIDE is dead and it's doesn't work 100% well under
>> WinXP (e.g. when compile it switch to fullscreen or sometimes crashes
>> or debugger don't work with new gcc) but for me it's still the best...
>>
> I think JED, GNU Emacs, FTE, TDE, VIM, etc. can all jump to GCC
> compiler errors via "C-x `" (backtick) or so. JED has a Borland-ish
> mode, and GNU Emacs has CUA mode. Anyways, RHIDE is internally based
> upon SETEDIT, so try that if you really want.
>
> P.S. I can't remember exactly, but I think RHIDE's GDB only works with
> COFF, so you may have to compile with "-gcoff" else it prefers Dwarf.
> When / if Eli finished GDB 7.0, that would make it that much easier (I
> assume) for someone to update RHGDB with it, if it ever gets
> resurrected. Don't hold your breath, though (but do feel free to help
> him if possible).
>
Already with gdb-6.3 (used for my last build of RHIDE several years
ago) RHIDE heavily depended on deprecated features of GDB. I do not
thing that this will improve with upcoming gdb-7.0. Most likely some
of required and deprecated features could even be removed completely.
I myself have not used RHIDE already for several years and have no plans
to use it. As the result it is extremely unlikely that I'll could do any
build
of RHIDE in future.
Andris
- Raw text -