Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 12:56:57 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Intent to package: keychain Message-ID: <20020216175657.GA27439@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3C6C5C3D DOT F42C08AA AT hack DOT kampbjorn DOT com> <3C6D03D6 DOT EC63C93C AT yahoo DOT com> <3C6E97DE DOT A76A04E9 AT hack DOT kampbjorn DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C6E97DE.A76A04E9@hack.kampbjorn.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 06:33:18PM +0100, Hack Kampbj?rn wrote: >Earnie Boyd wrote: >>Where's the tarball? Sounds like it would get my vote but where's the >>tarball? You've got to put up a local copy of the tarball for us to >>eyeball. >> > >That's not how I understood the setup.html instructions: first proposed >to do the package and if nobody is against then submit the package for >review. Yep. You've got it right. If there is a general interest in the package then you take it to the next step. cgf